<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Indieville : Critic watch</title><link>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Critic+watch/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Critic watch</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Film Programming: A New Wilderness for Former Film Critics.</title><link>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/11/11/film-programming-a-new-wilderness-for-former-film-critics.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f1d93deb-9a51-4894-b6dd-26135dd41f51:30310</guid><dc:creator>IFC.com - Indie Eye</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=30310</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/11/11/film-programming-a-new-wilderness-for-former-film-critics.aspx#comments</comments><description>Only two days removed from the announcement that Newsweek&amp;#39;s David Ansen would be taking over as the artistic director of the Los Angeles Film Festival, the L.A. Weekly&amp;#39;s chief film critic Scott Foundas has taken the Associate Program Director gig at the Film Society of Lincoln Center, where he had previously served as part of the New York Film Festival&amp;#39;s selection committee. Whether or not Foundas&amp;#39; position at the Weekly will actually be filled remains to be seen and all of this comes...(&lt;a href="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/11/11/film-programming-a-new-wilderness-for-former-film-critics.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=30310" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Festivals/default.aspx">Festivals</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Critic+watch/default.aspx">Critic watch</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/David+Ansen/default.aspx">David Ansen</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/AFI+Fest/default.aspx">AFI Fest</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Scott+Foundas/default.aspx">Scott Foundas</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Tom+Hall/default.aspx">Tom Hall</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Robert+Koehler/default.aspx">Robert Koehler</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/film+criticism/default.aspx">film criticism</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Sarasota+Film+Festival/default.aspx">Sarasota Film Festival</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Los+Angeles+Film+Festival/default.aspx">Los Angeles Film Festival</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Film+Society+of+the+Lincoln+Center/default.aspx">Film Society of the Lincoln Center</category></item><item><title>If movies are niche, shouldn't critics be too?</title><link>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/09/30/if-movies-are-niche-shouldn-t-critics-be-too.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f1d93deb-9a51-4894-b6dd-26135dd41f51:29976</guid><dc:creator>IFC.com - Indie Eye</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=29976</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/09/30/if-movies-are-niche-shouldn-t-critics-be-too.aspx#comments</comments><description>The Playlist is a useful blog that aggregates the day&amp;#39;s major entertainment news. They&amp;#39;re also been dabbling in reviews, which is how I came across Drew Taylor&amp;#39;s take on the acclaimed if by no means Romanian film &amp;quot;Police, Adjective,&amp;quot; which is screening at the New York Film Festival. Taylor calls it &amp;quot;the most boring fucking movie that&amp;#39;s ever been filmed. Ever,&amp;quot; as well as &amp;quot;pretentious nothingness,&amp;quot; and gives it an F. At the end of the review is a curious...(&lt;a href="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/09/30/if-movies-are-niche-shouldn-t-critics-be-too.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29976" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Critic+watch/default.aspx">Critic watch</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Jonathan+Rosenbaum/default.aspx">Jonathan Rosenbaum</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/New+York+Film+Festival+2009/default.aspx">New York Film Festival 2009</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/NYFF/default.aspx">NYFF</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/The+Playlist/default.aspx">The Playlist</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Ain_2700_t+It+Cool/default.aspx">Ain't It Cool</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Police+Adjective/default.aspx">Police Adjective</category></item><item><title>Buying in and selling out.</title><link>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/09/18/buying-in-and-selling-out.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f1d93deb-9a51-4894-b6dd-26135dd41f51:29887</guid><dc:creator>IFC.com - Indie Eye</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=29887</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/09/18/buying-in-and-selling-out.aspx#comments</comments><description>The Toronto International Film Festival ends tomorrow, but most journalists have already skipped ahead to extrapolating trends. There&amp;#39;s much loose talk about potential Oscar front-runners -- &amp;quot;Up In The Air&amp;quot; apparently has a lock -- and much free-floating despair about the tough climate for making, purchasing and marketing indie films. But at least one person thinks the recession&amp;#39;s been good for movies, by getting those arty directors to tone it down. Peter Howell of the Toronto...(&lt;a href="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/09/18/buying-in-and-selling-out.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29887" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Critic+watch/default.aspx">Critic watch</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Steven+Soderbergh/default.aspx">Steven Soderbergh</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Werner+Herzog/default.aspx">Werner Herzog</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Todd+Solondz/default.aspx">Todd Solondz</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Bad+Lieutenant_3A00_+Port+Of+Call+New+Orleans/default.aspx">Bad Lieutenant: Port Of Call New Orleans</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Toronto+2009/default.aspx">Toronto 2009</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Chloe/default.aspx">Chloe</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Atom+Egoyan/default.aspx">Atom Egoyan</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Ivan+Reitman/default.aspx">Ivan Reitman</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/The+Informant_2100_/default.aspx">The Informant!</category></item><item><title>"At The Movies" about as good as it could be.</title><link>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/09/08/quot-at-the-movies-quot-about-as-good-as-it-could-be.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:16:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f1d93deb-9a51-4894-b6dd-26135dd41f51:29797</guid><dc:creator>IFC.com - Indie Eye</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=29797</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/09/08/quot-at-the-movies-quot-about-as-good-as-it-could-be.aspx#comments</comments><description>We&amp;#39;re a long way from Siskel &amp;amp; Ebert, but the new &amp;quot;At The Movies&amp;quot; -- featuring The New York Times&amp;#39; A.O. Scott and The Chicago Tribune&amp;#39;s Michael Phillips -- is on the air. They are, of course, the replacements for the short-lived, universally reviled duo of the Bens (Lyons and Mankiewicz); Mankiewicz himself didn&amp;#39;t seem to get people too fired up, but Lyons was such an aggressively stupid guy that a site specifically devoted to relentlessly dogging him (a Web site that&amp;#39;s...(&lt;a href="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/09/08/quot-at-the-movies-quot-about-as-good-as-it-could-be.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29797" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Critic+watch/default.aspx">Critic watch</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/At+the+Movies/default.aspx">At the Movies</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Michael+Phillips/default.aspx">Michael Phillips</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/A.O.+Scott/default.aspx">A.O. Scott</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Big+Fan/default.aspx">Big Fan</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/The+Burning+Plain/default.aspx">The Burning Plain</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/All+About+Steve/default.aspx">All About Steve</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/9/default.aspx">9</category></item><item><title>Film critics gone wild.</title><link>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/09/01/film-critics-gone-wild.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:00:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f1d93deb-9a51-4894-b6dd-26135dd41f51:29748</guid><dc:creator>IFC.com - Indie Eye</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=29748</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/09/01/film-critics-gone-wild.aspx#comments</comments><description>Actually, that&amp;#39;s a misleading headline if there ever was one, considering that A.O. Scott and Michael Phillips look more buttoned up than ever in this promo for the new season of &amp;quot;At the Movies.&amp;quot; But after a year in the wilderness, I share the excitement of Karina Longworth and Anne Thompson in seeing the film critics from the New York Times and Chicago Tribune engage in serious discussions about films, though judging by that picture, I&amp;#39;d be afraid to say otherwise for fear of being...(&lt;a href="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/09/01/film-critics-gone-wild.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29748" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Critic+watch/default.aspx">Critic watch</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Watchy/default.aspx">Watchy</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Ben+Lyons/default.aspx">Ben Lyons</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Ben+Mankiewicz/default.aspx">Ben Mankiewicz</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/At+the+Movies/default.aspx">At the Movies</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Michael+Phillips/default.aspx">Michael Phillips</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/A.O.+Scott/default.aspx">A.O. Scott</category></item><item><title>"Halloween II" is, theoretically, awesome.</title><link>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/08/28/quot-halloween-ii-quot-is-theoretically-awesome.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f1d93deb-9a51-4894-b6dd-26135dd41f51:29721</guid><dc:creator>IFC.com - Indie Eye</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=29721</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/08/28/quot-halloween-ii-quot-is-theoretically-awesome.aspx#comments</comments><description>I love Rob Zombie&amp;#39;s &amp;quot;The Devil&amp;#39;s Rejects.&amp;quot; I think it&amp;#39;s one of the 30 best movies of the decade. But, according to my critic peers, that can&amp;#39;t possibly be the case, because we&amp;#39;re all horrific snobs -- or so the studios think. Dan Kois at New York is done with what he calls &amp;quot;the Summer of Film-Critic Irrelevance.&amp;quot; Since neither of today&amp;#39;s two major genre releases, &amp;quot;The Final Destination&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Halloween II,&amp;quot; is getting screened for critics...(&lt;a href="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/08/28/quot-halloween-ii-quot-is-theoretically-awesome.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29721" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Critic+watch/default.aspx">Critic watch</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/critics/default.aspx">critics</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Rob+Zombie/default.aspx">Rob Zombie</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Halloween+II/default.aspx">Halloween II</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/The+Devil_2700_s+Rejects/default.aspx">The Devil's Rejects</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/G.I+Joe/default.aspx">G.I Joe</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Rex+Reed/default.aspx">Rex Reed</category></item><item><title>How Rotten Tomatoes has changed film criticism.</title><link>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/08/19/how-rotten-tomatoes-has-changed-film-criticism.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f1d93deb-9a51-4894-b6dd-26135dd41f51:29648</guid><dc:creator>IFC.com - Indie Eye</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=29648</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/08/19/how-rotten-tomatoes-has-changed-film-criticism.aspx#comments</comments><description>The uproar Armond White raised by panning &amp;quot;District 9&amp;quot; has raised a lot of interesting points about The State of Film Criticism. It prompted Slate&amp;#39;s Daniel Engber to fret over his original pan of the film; being one of the few dissenting voices on review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes was, he wrote, &amp;quot;beginning to make me nervous.&amp;quot; So Engber did a little number-crunching and ranked 20 prominent critics from most to least contrarian based on how often they agreed with the Tomatometer...(&lt;a href="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/08/19/how-rotten-tomatoes-has-changed-film-criticism.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29648" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Critic+watch/default.aspx">Critic watch</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/District+9/default.aspx">District 9</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Armond+White/default.aspx">Armond White</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Jonathan+Rosenbaum/default.aspx">Jonathan Rosenbaum</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/J.+Hoberman/default.aspx">J. Hoberman</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Rotten+Tomatoes/default.aspx">Rotten Tomatoes</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Slate/default.aspx">Slate</category></item><item><title>Armond White and the art of trolling.</title><link>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/08/15/armond-white-and-the-art-of-trolling.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 19:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f1d93deb-9a51-4894-b6dd-26135dd41f51:29617</guid><dc:creator>IFC.com - Indie Eye</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=29617</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/08/15/armond-white-and-the-art-of-trolling.aspx#comments</comments><description>There are really two kinds of people who care about constantly controversial New York Press critic Armond White. There are those who care about keeping up with film criticism regardless of what the movie is; White&amp;#39;s a veteran critic, a member of the New York Film Critics Circle, etc. He is Important, and you read him. And then there&amp;#39;s the rabid geek who lurks on Rotten Tomatoes, waiting for someone to challenge his or her (or, c&amp;#39;mon, his) sense of priorities. Like &amp;quot;The 700 Club&amp;quot;...(&lt;a href="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/08/15/armond-white-and-the-art-of-trolling.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29617" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Critic+watch/default.aspx">Critic watch</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Roger+Ebert/default.aspx">Roger Ebert</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Transformers+2/default.aspx">Transformers 2</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/District+9/default.aspx">District 9</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Armond+White/default.aspx">Armond White</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Glenn+Beck/default.aspx">Glenn Beck</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Ice+Age_3A00_+Dawn+Of+The+Dinosaur/default.aspx">Ice Age: Dawn Of The Dinosaur</category></item><item><title>The critic and the pirate.</title><link>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/04/06/the-critic-and-the-pirate.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:09:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f1d93deb-9a51-4894-b6dd-26135dd41f51:28007</guid><dc:creator>IFC.com - Indie Eye</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=28007</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/04/06/the-critic-and-the-pirate.aspx#comments</comments><description>Coming to an airport romance novel shelf near you? Roger Friedman, critic/columnist for Fox News online, caused as big a stir as a film critic seems able to these difficult days when he posted a review of &amp;quot;X-Men Origins: Wolverine,&amp;quot; having illegally downloaded the leaked, unfinished version of the film. The internet immediately went into paroxyms of self-righteousness, with Ain&amp;#39;t It Cool News, among others, relishing in a chance to take the moral high ground by calling for Friedman&amp;#39;s...(&lt;a href="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2009/04/06/the-critic-and-the-pirate.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=28007" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Critic+watch/default.aspx">Critic watch</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/critics/default.aspx">critics</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/News+Corp/default.aspx">News Corp</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/20th+Century+Fox+Film/default.aspx">20th Century Fox Film</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/X-Men+Origins_3A00_+Wolverine/default.aspx">X-Men Origins: Wolverine</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Roger+Friedman/default.aspx">Roger Friedman</category></item><item><title>The year in top tens.</title><link>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2008/12/11/the-year-in-top-tens.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:18:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f1d93deb-9a51-4894-b6dd-26135dd41f51:25991</guid><dc:creator>IFC.com - Indie Eye</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=25991</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2008/12/11/the-year-in-top-tens.aspx#comments</comments><description>IFC Films&amp;#39; Keaton Kail has been so kind as to pass along the following endearingly obsessive spreadsheet he&amp;#39;s put together ranking the year&amp;#39;s films by their mentions in critic top ten lists. I&amp;#39;ll be resurfacing this post each week or so with updates as the lists continue to be unveiled. Here&amp;#39;s the big breakdown (click on the image to see it full-size): And here are separate charts breaking out docs and horror films:......(&lt;a href="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2008/12/11/the-year-in-top-tens.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=25991" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Critic+watch/default.aspx">Critic watch</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/top+tens/default.aspx">top tens</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/charts/default.aspx">charts</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/2008+in+review/default.aspx">2008 in review</category></item><item><title>Manohla Dargis is mean.</title><link>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2008/12/10/manohla-dargis-is-mean.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:52:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f1d93deb-9a51-4894-b6dd-26135dd41f51:25981</guid><dc:creator>IFC.com - Indie Eye</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=25981</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2008/12/10/manohla-dargis-is-mean.aspx#comments</comments><description>Or so says Patrick Goldstein at his blog at the LA Times, deeming her a &amp;quot;movie killer&amp;quot; and adding: It&amp;#39;s an open secret in indie Hollywood that no one wants Manohla Dargis to review their movie, fearing that the outspoken critic will tear their film limb from limb. It&amp;#39;s the ultimate backhanded compliment, since what they really fear is Manohla&amp;#39;s persuasiveness -- that she&amp;#39;ll write a review whose combination of vitriolic snarkiness and intellectual heft will actually persuade...(&lt;a href="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2008/12/10/manohla-dargis-is-mean.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=25981" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Critic+watch/default.aspx">Critic watch</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Manohla+Dargis/default.aspx">Manohla Dargis</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/The+Reader/default.aspx">The Reader</category></item><item><title>All thumbs™.</title><link>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2008/11/11/all-thumbs.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:51:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f1d93deb-9a51-4894-b6dd-26135dd41f51:25485</guid><dc:creator>IFC.com - Indie Eye</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=25485</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2008/11/11/all-thumbs.aspx#comments</comments><description>RogerEbert.com has switched over from the usual four star rating system to a mix of stars and thumbs, which makes for an interesting repurposing of the two digit approval system over which the critic got into a tiff with Disney. The thumbs, which have been sort of replaced by &amp;quot;See It/Skip It/Rent It&amp;quot; on the new incarnation of &amp;quot;At the Movies,&amp;quot; weren&amp;#39;t going to see air time with Bens Lyons and Mankiewicz -- Ebert and the late Gene Siskel&amp;#39;s family share ownership of the trademark...(&lt;a href="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2008/11/11/all-thumbs.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=25485" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Critic+watch/default.aspx">Critic watch</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Roger+Ebert/default.aspx">Roger Ebert</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/At+the+Movies/default.aspx">At the Movies</category></item><item><title>Same old song?</title><link>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2008/09/08/same-old-song.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:55:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f1d93deb-9a51-4894-b6dd-26135dd41f51:24402</guid><dc:creator>IFC.com - Indie Eye</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=24402</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2008/09/08/same-old-song.aspx#comments</comments><description>The heart of the newest issue of Cineaste is a massive symposium on that favorite topic of debate of film writers -- print criticism versus online criticism, critics versus bloggers, and on and on. I&amp;#39;ll &amp;#39;fess up to only scanning it -- this used to be a treasured topic of mine as well, but lately it&amp;#39;s seemed awfully insular, much retreading of old arguments with no ground gained (is there ground to be gained?), focused on medium when its content that&amp;#39;s actually at stake. As laid out...(&lt;a href="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2008/09/08/same-old-song.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=24402" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Critic+watch/default.aspx">Critic watch</category></item><item><title>The Roger Ebert of our age.</title><link>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2008/08/22/the-roger-ebert-of-our-age.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:35:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f1d93deb-9a51-4894-b6dd-26135dd41f51:24140</guid><dc:creator>IFC.com - Indie Eye</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=24140</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2008/08/22/the-roger-ebert-of-our-age.aspx#comments</comments><description>Or could he be more the Gene Siskel? Clearly, he&amp;#39;s aiming for both... Ben Mankiewicz better watch his back. The new season of &amp;quot;At the Movies&amp;quot; starts September 6, for anyone playing along at home. + Video: My break out in &amp;quot;House Bunny&amp;quot; (BenLyons.com)......(&lt;a href="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2008/08/22/the-roger-ebert-of-our-age.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=24140" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Critic+watch/default.aspx">Critic watch</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Watchy/default.aspx">Watchy</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Ben+Lyons/default.aspx">Ben Lyons</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/At+the+Movies/default.aspx">At the Movies</category></item><item><title>Mourning Manny Farber.</title><link>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2008/08/20/mourning-manny-farber.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:04:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f1d93deb-9a51-4894-b6dd-26135dd41f51:24104</guid><dc:creator>IFC.com - Indie Eye</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=24104</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2008/08/20/mourning-manny-farber.aspx#comments</comments><description>More on the passing of critic Manny Farber: J. Hoberman at the Village Voice (alongside a reprint of his 1981 essay &amp;quot;Termite Makes Right&amp;quot;): Farber wasn&amp;#39;t like other critics. He didn&amp;#39;t proselytize and he didn&amp;#39;t create systems. Rather, he articulated his idiosyncratic perception, which is to say: He had a sensibility. Farber was as punchy and hardboiled, at least in his prose, as Sam Fuller (a director he admired) and as masterful a vernacular stylist as S. J. Perelman (who, knowledgeable...(&lt;a href="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/2008/08/20/mourning-manny-farber.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=24104" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Critic+watch/default.aspx">Critic watch</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Memoriam/default.aspx">Memoriam</category><category domain="http://cs.entertainmentcareers.net/blogs/indie/archive/tags/Manny+Farber/default.aspx">Manny Farber</category></item></channel></rss>